Marijuana and the Rapidity of Social Change

Regardless of what you thought back then, gay marriage is now legal and becoming ever more so as court ruling after court ruling support it as an equal right. The speed at which this occurred is remarkable. Ten years ago, if you had been told that universal gay marriage would be the law of the land in ten years, you would have been incredulous.

The speed of social change has been accelerating. Back on January 1, 2010 I wrote a column that coined the phrase Transformation Decade for the 2010-2020 decade. The dictionary definition of transformation is “a change in nature, shape, character or form.” This means that most of humanity’s institutions and thinking will change their nature, shape character or form in this decade. Take a look at the institution of marriage in the United States today.

Now, think back five or six years ago and try to remember what you thought might be the possibility of decriminalized marijuana in the United States. Most likely you either didn’t give it a thought or thought that it was something that wasn’t going to happen anytime soon. There was not much reason to think otherwise.

In September 2010, I forecast that: “Marijuana will be decriminalized in America by the middle of the decade”. This forecast was based upon my view that the speed of change had accelerated to the point of being environmental and that this decade would be a time of transformational change. That legacy thinking from the 20^th century would give way to new thinking in this century.

Certainly in the three years that followed this forecast people universally thought it was nuts, that there was no way this could happen by 2015-2016. It is interesting that since the beginning of this year, people now nod their heads about this forecast. The news from Colorado and now Washington State, plus all the new fall ballot initiatives in Alaska, Oregon and Florida point to a potential reality where two thirds of the states will have decriminalized marijuana by the end of the year.

So here we are in the middle of 2014 and two thirds of the states and -- by the end of the year -- two thirds of the population of the United States will live in a place where marijuana is decriminalized to some significant degree. If you had been told five or six years ago that this would be true you would not have believed it possible, similar to gay marriage.

The obvious disconnect of course is that at the federal level, marijuana is still classified as a dangerous drug, grouped with heroin and cocaine. In a way this is much like many other issues in the United States. The total gridlock of the federal government, the inability to pass legislation, lead with vision and confront the urgent realities of the country today has led to states and cities initiating change. Political leadership on many issues has moved from Washington D.C. to states out of necessity. Problems have to be solved and budget deficits need to be closed by finding new taxes that can help close the gap.

The Obama administration has generally moved towards standing down from harsh enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that have decriminalized it. Yet in these states there is this dual reality. Marijuana is both legal and illegal. The direction at the state level is clear. The direction of the country is clear, as all polls show that a majority of Americans favor decriminalization. So here we have the federal government and its policies clearly out of step with what the citizens are implementing.

That leads to the national elections in 2016; the last year that could be grouped into my phrase “middle of the decade.” There will be no way any politician that wants to run for president will be able to avoid taking a position on the decriminalizing of marijuana. It is that simple. In the past, one of the ways to avoid taking a stand for a national candidate was to say that an issue should be left to the states to decide. Okay, done!

What is your position, Senator/Governor/Secretary? The majority of registered voters polled favor decriminalization; isn’t it your responsibility to represent the will of the people? Are you saying the states and the clear majority of voters point of view is less important that your moral view or your opinion?

It should be noted that there was no viable candidate for president in 2008 -- Obama, Clinton or McCain -- that was openly in favor of gay marriage. Now they all are. It is the law. Hmmm.

David Houle is a futurist, strategist and speaker. He has always been slightly ahead of the curve.Houle spent more than 20 years in media and entertainment. Most recently, David is a featured contributor to Oprah.com. Check him out here www.oprah.com/davidhoule. David can be contacted at David@DavidHoule.com.

Read all David’s MediaBizBloggers commentaries at Evolution Shift.

Check us out on Facebook at MediaBizBloggers.com
Follow our Twitter updates at @MediaBizBlogger

The opinions and points of view expressed in this commentary are exclusively the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaBizBloggers.com management or associated bloggers. MediaBizBloggers is an open thought leadership platform and readers may share their comments and opinions in response to all commentaries.

Image at top courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net