Pepsi's 3rd Place Position – Social Media Was NOT the Problem - Julie Roehm

Welcome Julie Roehm our newest MediaBizBloggerThe past week must have been a slow one on the marketing and advertising drama front because the stories that are getting top billing in many publications are all about Pepsi and the death of social media Leave it to marketers to get you to read an article that predicts doom and gloom for the platform that was considered the newest darling of the industryWhat is particularly interesting about all of this at least to me is that people love to be dramatic and go to the RIP type of comments based on only a small set of cases The cases that have been front and center are those of the Pepsi Refresh campaign and also the Burger King campaign though the latter to a lesser degreeIn January of 2010 The New York Times had an article that outlined the purpose and intent behind the Refresh campaign They wrote quotthe project is meant to tap into a booming trend for what is called causerelated marketing or prosocial marketing by which corporations seek to back up their talk about benefiting societyquot They quoted Lee Clow the Chief Creative Officer and Global Director for Media Arts at TBWA Worldwide in LA who said quotOur idea was that this year we39d try to shift the marketing and communications to something that39s truly walking the walkquot The goal is quotto develop a mechanism for young people to create ideas to make things betterquot he added that quotwill ultimately become part of the global behavior of the brandquotAnd to be fair connecting corporate responsibility in an authentic way is highly impactful and does change the way people feel about a brand Take for example Microsoft While Bill Gates is no longer running the company they still get a large positive bump in terms of perception associated with its founder39s enormous charitable effortsBut done at the expense of all other messages is something no company can afford to do Nike doesn39t do it PampampG doesn39t do it and neither should Pepsi Rance Crain of Ad Age stated quotthere39s also the danger that consumers could conceivably tire of causes or decide that Pepsi a marketer long known for its ability to amuse and entertain is taking itself too seriously After all we39re talking about fizzy soda water herequotHe went on to compare Pepsi39s Refresh campaign with the brand that has usurped its number two position Coke In fact the quotOpen Happinessquot campaign has been a wellreceived multifaceted multimedia depiction of the brand that links to all generations in all the media that are most influenced by such messages And because of it paired with the fact that Pepsi abandoned this space they have made share gainsPepsi would argue that they have in fact been multimedia in their approach to the Refresh campaign In a statement the company said quotThe Pepsi Refresh Project was launched as a 360degree marketing campaign including targeted influencer outreach celebrity involvement sports sponsorship activation employee bottler and customer engagement substantial public relations activities and as widely reported a significant mass multimedia investment to coincide with the program launch on Feb 1 The Pepsi Refresh Project far surpassed consumer engagement and awareness expectations and industry benchmarks within the first several months of the campaignquotTaking all of this in stride leads me to just a few conclusions1 Pepsi was once quotThe Choice of a New Generationquot but they seem to have stopped working hard to continue to connect to that original quotNew Generationquot who are now quite a bit older Abandoning those that put you where you are is never a good idea especially when you are a mass producer and seller whose profits are made on volume as much as margin2 In its quest to be relevant and fresh they narrowed their focus to media that is also narrowly focused Perhaps a good idea for promoting their more progressive positioning but when done alone leaves others hanging3 They relied too heavily on the idea that those that had always drank Pepsi and due to the high loyalty of long time Pepsi or Coke drinkers to their soda assumed that they would stay even if they were not in front of them in the traditional media properties What they seemed to have misjudged was that the generations who are not yet loyal to one soda were not influenced enough by the Refresh campaign4 And that brings me to the next major point more important than the rest which is that the message had nearly nothing to do with the product or the sale of that product It was altruistic and admirable but it did not engage people with the drink itself nor the stores they are sold only the endeavors that the campaign supported5 Pepsi at the end of the day is a mass brand and that means appealing to the masses on the product first and using the corporate responsibility to augment this and to entice others that are less influenced by the general message secondIn the shortest terms the Refresh effort seemed geared to drive people to something other than the product itself amp8211 it drove people to like the campaign not the product It drove them to websites not the stores to buy it You cannot walk away from that which generates profits They are a publicly traded company and without profitability their ability to support other causes goes away The campaign was great but should have been done in tandem with a larger message about the product in the vein that made them successful in the first place the products taste coupled with it39s progressive youthful energy entertainment or both That means a mix of traditional media with less traditional media that would embrace a new generation without abandoning the original one Social media can and will drive success and did for the Refresh campaign That was not the problem There is no doubt that the Refresh campaign DID help to move the needle for the philanthropic elements of the effort just not the one that countssalesJulie Roehm is currently consulting for a host of companies in the area of marketing strategy and execution The companies include large media companies ad agencies interactive television technology companies financial services private equity media companies automotive new media startups and others She frequently is engaged to speak at industry and corporate events globally and is a periodic guest contributor on Fox Business News blogs for iMedia and is the official marketing auto blogger for AOL Julie can be reached at roehmjuliegmailcomRead all Julie39s MediaBizBloggers commentaries at Julie RoehmCheck us out on Facebook at MediaBizBloggerscomFollow our Twitter updates MediaBizBloggerMediaBizBloggers is an openthought leadership blog platform for media marketing and advertising professionals companies and organizations To contribute contact Jackmediadvisorygroupcom The opinions expressed in MediaBizBloggerscom are not those of Media Advisory Group its employees or other MediaBizBloggerscom contributors Media Advisory Group accepts no responsibility for the views of MediaBizBloggers authors

Become a Thought Leader.
Share your thought leadership article with industry professionals & have them archived in Thought Leadership

Pepsi's 3rd Place Position – Social Media Was NOT the Problem - Julie Roehm

Author

Publish date

Channel

Archived in

Julie Roehm

"About That with Carl Mayer:" Alaina Donnellon (Episode 10: Political Spending) - By Carl Mayer

More Videos:

Become a Thought Leader. Share your thought leadership article with industry professionals & have them archived in Thought Leadership

Pepsi's 3rd Place Position – Social Media Was NOT the Problem - Julie Roehm

Enjoying This Commentary? There's More to Love

Julie Roehm

"About That with Carl Mayer:" Alaina Donnellon (Episode 10: Political Spending) - By Carl Mayer

The payment was successful

Cookies

Become a Thought Leader.
Share your thought leadership article with industry professionals & have them archived in Thought Leadership