NORMAN: There was a period of time, and it's been a much longer period of time than we should reasonably expect, where we segmented digital marketing from marketing. The consumer is always miles ahead of us and consumers stopped segmenting their digital life and the rest of their life a long time ago, yet we persisted with this separation. And of course, we still do it. And we talk about analog television and digital video and so on and so forth. For example, to refer to the New York Times as a newspaper because part of the way it distributes its content is on printed paper, but there's an infinitely larger number of people that consume it in digital environments and across screens than there are that consume it on paper.
NORMAN: What you might run on broadcast is the same as you would run on cable, which is the same as you would run on a full episode player, which may be the same as you would run on TrueView, for example, with YouTube, but probably wouldn't be what you would attempt to use on Snapchat or Facebook video or Twitter. So yes, I think about it a lot. Watch Rob's full interview here.
NORMAN: People make ads for college football. At the moment, they don't make ads for Mr. Robot. And I think the time will come when the gift that keeps on giving, which is the same ad or a few ads over and over and over and over again isn't going to work anymore. And what we're going to have to do is think about television properties in the same way that we think about sports properties.
NORMAN: At which point can you justify a premium price for limited commercial inventory? And in order to get that price, you've got to get it in two ways. One is you have to show that advertising is more effective in the limited commercial inventory environment. And two, you got to hope that by limiting the commercial inventory, you actually maintain your ratings during the commercial break more effectively than you do in the show break, show environment that we've had traditionally. Watch Rob's full interview here.
NORMAN: We believe firmly and institutionally that the more good content there is in the world the better it is for both consumers and for advertisers. There clearly is now and has always been a whole lot of media on the fringe of content production that very few people would care about one way or the other if it existed or not.
NORMAN: It's up to us to explain to the ultimate buyers, who are our clients and their shareholders' what it is actually that they're spending their money on and how verification works. And that they should at least take that into account in their budget allocation and decision‑making.
NORMAN: We are in a battle for effectiveness. Not just between channels, but for advertising as a whole. From a capital allocation point of view as a whole about where do I spend my money in order to drive brand growth and profit? And if advertising fails to deliver relative to other things like price promotion, for example, then structurally our business is threatened. Watch Rob's full interview here.
[We at least need to make] sure we're level set on the integrity of the market. At least make sure that we're comparing apples with apples and occasionally with oranges, but not so often with orangutans is super important if we're going to maintain the integrity of what's become a tremendously complex business.
NORMAN: You know, I love Snapchat. I think it's a genius business. I really do. And it's a kind of an interesting curiosity to me. It almost feels like a generational shift in an interface point of view that I had to work much harder to understand it. I watch people who are much younger than me intuitively getting it much more quickly than I did, which means it's probably very good. But if you're going to as a brand decide to participate in Snapchat stories then you've got to do so in a way that it doesn't make it look like you're your parents dancing at a disco. There's that old adage about putting the objects of yesterday into the containers of today and tomorrow. It's never historically been a terribly successful strategy to do that. It's clear to me that YouTube is important and Snapchat is important and that Twitter is important and that Amazon is important. But we can't extract the value that that importance creates unless we have the assets to do it.
Click to Watch:
Click the social buttons above or below to share this story with your friends and colleagues.
The opinions and points of view expressed in this article are exclusively the views of the author and/or subject(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaVillage.com/MyersBizNet, Inc. management or associated bloggers.